Stolen Child, Nigel Cooper - NATO security consultant

Nigel Cooper - NATO security consultant

Nigel Cooper recently exposed both the UK Government and the UK Legal System as corrupt criminal organisations responsible for the stealing of his young daughter - see his Youtube report, where links to his blog and documentary evidence are also posted.

 

As a result of his exposure of the UK Government and the UK Legal System as corrupt and criminal, Nigel has been banned from the UK for 10 years under threat of imprisonment should he return.

His evidence is so accurate and compelling that the UK had to commit further criminal acts to override judicial decisions made in Belgian Courts which had found in Nigel's favour, and awarded him custody of his daughter.

 

The Belgian authorities have been shocked at the blatant and aggressive abuse of power by the UK Government in their desperation to snatch the child at whatever cost.

Having spoken out about his own case and also revealed that the child snatch represents one crime in many thousands of unlawful child kidnaps by the UK State, Nigel has been contacted by hundreds of other parents victims to child snatching, trafficking and abuse by the UK State.

Since the middle of last week, Nigel has received multiple death threats and has been forced to leave his home in Belgium. He is in a safe location with his wife.

The sudden explosion of threats and venom against him follows the pattern shown against other activists trying to expose the £ multi-billion international child trafficking industry run and protected by the UK government.

 

Happily we can report that Nigel's case and plight has been recognised by the Slovakian and Indian governments who have recently gone public on an international scale in accusing the UK government of child kidnap and trafficking. Russia has also stated on the international stage that they are concerned by the activities of 'child protection' services in the UK and the stealing of children of non British origin.

 

Please take action. Firm, peaceful and polite - contact British media outlets to inform them of the story and to ask why they are not already covering it. Contact your MP to demand action. Talk to relatives and friends in the police to inform them and ask for their help in exposing the high level paedophiles in the UK establishment. 

Email, twitter and tweet. But above all do not let this case die. As with Hollie Greig and Jimmy Savile the evidence of child abuse by those in authority is just all too clear.

Original Thesis on Agenda 21 & Communitarianism

Claiming ownership of our original thesis on Agenda 21 & Communitarianism

by Niki Raapana and Nordica Friedrich.

Keep finding new places that are citing our antithesis as if it's just "common knowledge" now. This is a major breakthough and we're very pleased to see how far and wide it's gone. After ten years of being the only people pushing an original Anti Communitarian thesis into the mainstream arena, it's a very good feeling to witness how many people have finally learned to pronounce it! 

 

The downside for us is, the world is so communitarian now that our copyright on our published thesis and our original idea has been violated on a scale we never imagined. We are seeing our names removed, portions reproduced as if the author was someone else, or flat out plagiarization of everything. Worst of all, some writers are twisting it around and adding their own conclusion to our thesis without bothering to show where in the hell they came up with their idea! Academia has always been plagued with robbers who steal papers from fellow students. I wonder how often it's happened outside academia. We may not only have one of the most widely read original theses in modern times, but we may also own the most plagiarized thesis by non-academics in modern times.

Our original research, thoughts, lines, articles, and thesis is in other people's books 

 

Sustainable Development Handbook

 

It's in videos of other people

ROSA KOIRE: Shut down Agenda 21 and communitarian Fascism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBrwuhoavG0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qKvnu_f02F0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PHBHsxIG-zg

http://shiftfrequency.com/tag/communitarianism/

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/10/un-agenda-21-exposed-with-rosa-koire-video-2482896.html

 

It's in articles "written" by other people

http://ppjg.me/tag/communitarianism/

Communitarian Heresy in the Classroom: Charles Haynes and the Bible Literacy Project

Community by Coercion Communitarianism New American May 31, 2004

COOLECTIVIST MINDSET: RECIPE FOR REVOLUTION

 

It's in letters written by other people

http://resist21.com/2013/02/05/letter-from-rosa-koire-executive-dir-of-post-sustainability-institute-to-democrats-in-the-oklahoma-legislature-to-support-hb-1412/

Our original idea has been reproduced so many times many people may assume Rosa Koire, the John Birch Society or Debra Rae are the ones who showed conclusively the role of Communitarianism in Agenda 21. They did not. The JBS barely mentioned it in the past 20 years, and only lately began using the term in their Anti Agenda 21 meetings. Debra Rae went so far as to take entire sections out of 2020: Our Common Destiny as well as TACM, and while she mentions she took most of her article from us at her website, she apparently forgot where she got it when she gained a larger audience at News With Views. Rosa Koire did not do any original research that led her to a Communitarian conclusion either. Rosa read both our books before she put her final argument together. But she never cites us in her public speaking engagments anymore (not since her Tea Party video in 2011), and she actually removed Nordica's name from TACM. The upside is that Rosa never removed the reference and link to the Anti Communitarian League at DemocratsAgainstUNAgenda21. We're still in her book somewhere (haven't seen it yet). 

I have no problem saying Rosa Koire has done a tremendous amount of research on her own. She has been a major force in bringing Agenda 21 in front of the Tea Party and the Religious Right. We do not disparage the valuable contributions she's made to exposing the plan in her traveling book promotions. But Rosa did not make the connections between Communitarianism and Agenda 21, she knows she didn't, and it's dishonest of her to make it appear like she did. 

Now I'm fully aware that communitarian America doesn't care what we sacrificed to provide this thesis to them. I've heard the Christian collectivists whining more than the leftists about how it doesn't matter where the information comes from, it's so important the rules do not even apply. I've been told I'm jealous of Rosa's success. I've been told I need to "share more." Total BS. I defend property rights for everyone else, why wouldn't I give myself and my co-author the same consideration? I do know zero value is placed on intellectual property on the internet, but it's just hilarious that other people so worried about their property rights think it's okay to steal ours!  We haven't gone around asking everyone who reposts our website/works to take it down. As long as there is proper attribution, it's educational and not for profit, it's allowed. Remove the attribution, pretend it's your original thoughts and words, or make money off it, and it's not allowed. 

 

Copyright Law of the United States

There is only one antithesis that shows Communitarianism is the synthesis in the Hegelian dialectic. There is only one antithesis that shows Agenda 21 is Communitarianism. There is only one book in the world that shows evidence for the connection between Agenda 21 and Communitariansim, Communitarian Law, Asset Based Community Development and Community Oriented Policing. Those are chapter titles in 2020: Our Common Destiny & The Anti Communitarian Manifesto.

War Crimes: US and British-Backed Weapons Airlift From Croatia to Terrorists in Syria

Open War Crimes: US and British-Backed Weapons Airlift From Croatia to Terrorists in Syria

The evidence is now in, as list of state actors can now be seen openly conspiring to drive the Middle East into full-blown war.

Article | March 11, 2013 - 9:58pm | By Patrick Henningsen

It’s well known by now that the NATO and Gulf States' initial plans to overturn the sovereign state of Syria has been running behind schedule since their operation was launched two years ago. They had hoped for the sort of slam dunk which they enjoyed in overturning the country of Libya in late 2011.
This same formula could not be applied again however, so Plan B, a ground war using proxies has meant a longer drawn out conflict, with western backed terrorist groups sustaining heavy losses in their fight to topple the Assad government on behalf of NATO and its Gulf allies.
The main obstacle with Plan B is that the very idea of directly arming terrorists in Syria is not one which can be sold openly in either the US or Britain. Plan C is to draw in the UN by creating a ‘chemical weapons’ crisis in Syria, but thanks to a prominent online leak of documents relating to UK DOD contractor Britam, the British have been caught brokering a deal transferring ex-Gaddafi stocks from Libya to Syria to be blamed on Assad, paid for by Qatar. The WMD threat still remains a hard sell for western voters…
From the NATO Allied corner, something drastic needed to be done.
Whilst politicians in the West, namely those in Washington DC, London and parts of Europe, have been publicly denying that they were helping to organise running arms into Syria and issuing very public pleads for ‘humanitarian aid’ for those they identify as the Syrian Opposition, activity back stage has been furious. The debate in government and the media has been mere window dressing for the real operation being quietly carried out.

NATO Gun-running via Croatia

It can now be revealed that NATO allied nations were busy using proxy states to drive their war in Syria – putting together one of the biggest international black operation transfers of military supplies in recent history. So it’s official: large caches of hardware from the West have been transferred to the Syrian jihadist mercenary collective known as the ‘Free Syrian Army’ , ‘Syrian Rebels’, or ‘Syrian Opposition’ – depending on who you ask, a brash move which may be vehemently opposed by other UN Security Council members – namely Russia and China.
Multiple media sources reveal the details of this massive airlift comprised of 75 airplanes, and an estimated 3,000 tons of military weaponry on board has left Croatia and has already been delivered… to Syria.
It is also confirmed from these reports that Saudi Arabia has financed a large portion of this purchase secretly transported to al Qaeda and other FSA fighters – who are working with the support of the CIA, MI6 and others, along with other financial and material support of Qatar and Saudi, to further destabilise and overthrow the Assad government in Syria.
Croatia’s daily newspaper Jutarnji List reported:

From the start of November last year, till February this year, 75 planes flew out from Zagreb Airport with over 3,000 tons of weapons and ammunition bound for Syrian rebels…
The newspaper, quoting diplomatic sources, says that besides Croatian weapons the planes were full with weapons from other European countries including the UK. The weapons were organised by the United States of America.
Sources say that the first few flights to leave Croatia bound for Syria with weapons were operated by Turkish Cargo, which is owned by Turkish Airlines. After those flights, Jordanian International Air Cargo took over the flights. The deal to provide arms to the rebels was made between American officials and the Croatian Ambassador to the US.

In addition to this huge gun-running operation, Croatia also appears to be guilty of either having advanced knowledge, or possibly coordinating with Syrian terrorists as evidenced by their recently withdraw all of troops from the UN observer mission in Golan Heights, indicating that the recent kidnapping by Free Syrian Army Terrorists of at least 20 UNIFIL peacekeepers in the Golan Heights was known in advance by Croatia.
The kidnapping incident may have been designed to test the UN, but also to pull Syria’s southern neighbor, Israel, even closer to the conflict, a development which would almost surely prompt the UN to declare this as trigger to a regional crisis, followed by an authorised military intervention. Pulling Israel in would also risk involving Hezbollah from Lebanon, who are already engaging in assisting Assad in training a new specialist paramilitary force in Syria to deal with urban warfare.
If it was known by Croatia, then one can only conclude that this was also known by US and British operatives as well. Both the US and Britain will naturally claim deniability as their legal out in this case, by deniability through the use of proxies makes no innocent parties when the prospect of a multi-regional war beckons as a result of the west’s financial, logistical, political, and now material involvement in the overthrow of a sovereign state and internationally recognised government.
Much worse, however, is that by employing proxies like Jordan, Croatia, Turkey,and others, the NATO allies have guaranteed long-term retribution down the road, should Syria prevail in this fight. For Syria, it is now known which countries collaborated with the West to dismantle their country. This fact alone will ensure conflict in the region for a generation.
US officials are on record as admitting to helping arrange the weapons airlift, as cited in this Feb 25, 2012 article in the New York Times:
“An official in Washington said the possibility of the transfers from the Balkans was broached last summer, when a senior Croatian official visited Washington and suggested to American officials that Croatia had many weapons available should anyone be interested in moving them to Syria’s rebels.”

Terrorist receive recoilless guns from the former Yugoslavia

Revelations are not limited to the Croatian news report, as we see the US and Europe’s mainstream media wall of silence has begun to crack, including here a recent report from London’s Daily Telegraph sent across Syria’s borders with Jordan and NATO-member Turkey. The article entitled, “US and Europe in ‘major airlift of arms to Syrian rebels through Zagreb’“ goes on to give further details of direct European involvement in illegal weapons running:

The United States has coordinated a massive airlift of arms to Syrian rebels from Croatia with the help of Britain and other European states, despite the continuing European Union arms embargo, it was claimed yesterday…
Decisions by William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, to provide non-lethal assistance and training, announced in the past week, were preceded by much greater though less direct Western involvement in the rebel cause, according to a Croat newspaper.
The shipments were allegedly paid for by Saudi Arabia at the bidding of the United States, with assistance on supplying the weapons organised through Turkey and Jordan, Syria’s neighbours.
…as from Croatia, weapons came “from several other European countries including Britain”, without specifying if they were British-supplied or British-procured arms.
British military advisers however are known to be operating in countries bordering Syria alongside French and Americans, offering training to rebel leaders and former Syrian army officers…

… The weapons, including rocket launchers, recoil-less guns and the M79 anti-tank weapon, have been seen in rebel hands in numerous videos, and were first spotted by an arms expert Eliot Higgins, who blogs under the name Brown Moses. He traced them moving from Dera’a in the south, near the Jordanian border, to Aleppo and Idlib provinces in the north.

Hague: Denies Britain’s involvement in gun-running

It is also no big secret that Britain has deployed a significant contingent of troops and support personnel to Jordan at least as far back as Autumn 2012 as part of its ongoing ‘joint military exercises’ with the Jordan military, but this latest revelation puts into clearer perspective the overwhelming likelihood that high level British military operation have actually been involved in the transfer of arms from Jordan into the hands of the international terrorist confab of mostly foreign fighter running under the west’s media banner of “Syrian Rebels”.

Consequences for Croatia, and Britain

What Britain may be guilty of here, is cynically – and illegally, trying to side-stepping the EU embargo on arms into Syria by using the fledgling EU state of Croatia as their delivery mechanism, because Croatia does not officially join the EU until July 1, and has not implemented any binding EU legislation. This flagrant violation of both EU and international law should mean that Croatia’s entrance into the EU could be appealed by other members states willing to raise an objection, with what are now clear grounds to mount a legal challenge against Croatia.
Regardless of any EU outcomes however, Croatia at least –  is guilty of international war crimes.

International and EU Sanctions Against the US, Britain, Turkey, Qatar and Saudi Arabia

As expected, Britain’s Foreign Office denies all of the claims connecting it to the Croatian gun-running program, but if Britain is involved – even indirectly, through a proxy like Croatia, or if British military personnel are aiding and abetting these known terrorist fighters in Syria through the transfer of weaponry, then Britain can also be brought into the international legal framework to answer for what it has done behind the public’s back.
The international war crimes which are now in the public view could test the legal framework of the EU, the UN and the ICC in the Hague. The legal door is now open for charges against state actors including US, Britain, Qatar and Saudi Arabia – for the crimes of illegally arming a force of foreign fighters and known terrorists in Syria – designed to destroy the country from within. Many UN resolutions, including the recent Resolution 1973 applied in Libya by the UN, have been implemented on much more spurious and shaky grounds than the overwhelming evidence available regarding Syria.

Consequences for NATO and the UN

Despite any denials in Brussels, NATO are involved through their member states Turkey and Croatia, as well as US, UK, and France from behind. Any involvement should question these country’s NATO status, or at least it begs the question what is NATO for, or even the UN, if their member states are conspiring together to subvert international law?
Moreover, Israel’s unwarranted airstrike against a Syrian Military Research facility last month was also ignored by the UN, but this is not surprising as Israel has long been allowed to operate outside of international law and norms.
If the international community does not act in this instance, then it opens the door to more brazen criminality sans borders, which could spawn similar illegal operations against Iran, opening the door to a Third World War.

US uniformed Personnel Training Rebels in Jordan

Der Spiegel also reports this week that, despite denials by Washington DC, Americans are definitely training Syrian rebels in neighboring Jordan. The reports goes on:

It is not clear if the Americans are members of the US armed forces or are part of a private contracting firm, but the trainers wear uniforms, the paper reported.
It added that the training, which also involves Jordanian intelligence officers, had been going on “for some time,” and that the rebels were being taught how to use anti-tank weaponry.

France sends ‘aid’ for Syria to Jordan

France played an integral part in the destruction of Libya in 2011, and they might also have an interest in their former colonial possessions in Syria, but it’s not clear as yet if France’s commitment to overthrowing the Assad government is on par with the US and Britain’s efforts. Back in August 2012, France had also been sending large shipments designated for Syria via Jordan, claiming that these shipment contained ‘aid and medical supplies’ – intended for Syrian refugees. Real Syrian News reported:

An Antonov 124 cargo aircraft landed at the Marka military airport in Amman on Saturday. The cargo is said to include a field hospital and medical supplies for the refugees in the Zaatari camp near the Syrian border. An A310 airliner carrying 85 French military staff and medical equipment arrived in Jordan on Thursday.

After the Croatian airlift, it’s now not a stretch to suspect that other countries could be involved in similar operations under the cover of supplying ‘humanitarian aid’.

Consequences for Jordan

The overwhelming body of evidence proves that Jordan is playing the key role as proxy and facilitator for the West’s wishes and desires to destroy the country of Syria. The consequences for Jordan, should the West’s efforts fail, is that Jordan has now exposed itself as a provocateur and enemy of both Syria, and Lebanon, and indeed Iran also. It is not know how much Jordan has been paid for its services, or what promises have been made to its royal family in exchange for facilitating the Syrian upheaval, but it cannot compensate Jordan for playing the crucial role in possibly fomenting a regional or multi-theatre global war.

Syria Crisis Planned by the US and NATO Allies Before the ‘Arab Spring’

Despite previous denials and avoiding the issue by states persons like Hillary Clinton and William Hague, it is certain that ‘al Qaeda’ terrorists are operating in Syria and receive various kinds of support from the West and their Gulf allies, and that these are many of the same terrorist who are responsible for violence and killing in Iraq. The New York Times confirmed this fact recently:

Iraqi officials said the extremists operating in Syria are in many cases the very same militants striking across their country. “We are 100 percent sure from security coordination with Syrian authorities that the wanted names that we have are the same wanted names that the Syrian authorities have, especially within the last three months,” Izzat al-Shahbandar — a close aide to the Iraqi prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki — said in an interview on Tuesday. “Al Qaeda that is operating in Iraq is the same as that which is operating in Syria,” he said.

Bangkok based analyst, Tony Cartalucci, from Land Destroyer blog, adds another important piece of evidence in this mix, pointing out the fact that the US and its NATO operatives have been engineering the crisis in Syria well before the official ‘uprising’ began in 2011:

Pulitizer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh, in his 2007 New Yorker report titled, “The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?“stated explicitly that: “To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has cooperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.

Cartalucci provides further background to support the west’s own knowledge and involvement is the current crisis:

Is there any doubt that the US has executed this plot in earnest, arming and funding sectarian extremists “sympathetic to Al Qaeda” on both Syria’s northern and southern border? Where else, if not from the West and its regional allies, Israel, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, could extremists be getting their weapons, cash, and logistical support from?
And of course, Syria’s borders with Jordan and Turkey have been long-ago identified by the US Army’s own West Point Combating Terrorism Center (CTC) as hotbeds of sectarian extremist/Al Qaeda activity – hotbeds that the West is purposefully funneling thousands of tons of weaponry through, while disingenuously claiming it is attempting to prevent such weapons from falling into the hands of extremists.
The CTC’s 2007 report, “Al-Qa’ida’s Foreign Fighters in Iraq,” identified Syria’s southeastern region near Dayr Al-Zawr on the Iraqi-Syrian border, the northwestern region of Idlib near the Turkish-Syrian border, and Dar’a in the south near the Jordanian-Syrian border, as having produced the majority of fighters found crossing over into Iraq throughout the duration of the Iraq War.

Image: (Left) West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center’s 2007 report, “Al-Qa’ida’s Foreign Fighters in Iraq” indicated which areas in Syria Al Qaeda fighters filtering into Iraq came from during the US invasion/occupation. The overwhelming majority of them came from Dayr Al-Zawr in Syria’s southeast, Idlib in the north near the Turkish-Syrian border, and Dar’a in the south near the Jordanian-Syrian border. (Right) A map indicating the epicenters of violence in Syria indicate that the exact same hotbeds for Al Qaeda in 2007, now serve as the epicenters of so-called “pro-democracy fighters.” These areas are now admittedly the epicenters of fighting, and more importantly, despite being historical hotbeds of Al Qaeda activity, precisely where the West is flooding with cash, weapons, and military “advisers.”

Just like in Libya where the West literally handed an entire nation to sectarian extremists, we are watching a verbatim repeat in Syria – where we are told Al Qaeda terrorists are “pro-democracy” “freedom fighters” that deserve US cash, weapons, and support, when it couldn’t be any clearer they aren’t.
Not only has the US and UK lied to the world about their policy toward Syria and their current level of support for increasingly overt terrorists committing an array of atrocities – their latest act including the taking of over 20 UN peacekeepers hostage in the Golan Heights - but have revealed once again the manufactured facade that is the “War on Terror…”

Terrorist Groups Currently Active in Syria

Known terrorist groups are operating in Syria and are receiving the full backing of NATO Allies and Gulf states Qatar and Saudi Arabia. They include – but are not limited to, Saudi Intelligence-backed Jabhat al-Nusra or ‘al Nursa Front’, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group,  Abdullah Azzam Brigades and Al Baraa ibn Malik Martyrdom Brigade, the jihadist group Ahrar al-Sham, the PKK (in northeast Syria), Kata’ib Mohadzherin from the Russian Caucus region - to name only a few.
Earlier reports of rogue Russian and Chechen terrorists filtering into Syria appear to be preceded by Salafists killing Sufi leaders in the Russian Federation. The Pakistan Christian Post reports:

Recently in Dagestan the Sufi spiritual leader Said Efendi Chirkeisky was killed by a suicide bomber along with a few followers. This happened in late August and the closeness to the recent attack against Sufi leaders in Tatarstan is a clear reminder that Salafism is a potent force within parts of the Russian Federation. Therefore, not surprisingly the Russian Federation is extremely alarmed by major Western powers once more working in collusion with the FSA, al-Qaeda and a whole array of Salafi terrorist organizations.

It’s worth noting also that like Libya’s new militant governor of Tripoli, Abdel Hakim Belhadj, terrorist group Kata’ib Mohadzherin’s leader Airat Vakhitov was also imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, in 2002 after being captured by U.S. forces in Afghanistan. Both were released and filtered back into fighting regions to organise al Qaeda-type Islamist groups – both active in countries which the US and NATO have been actively vying for regime change, in Libya and Syria respectively. You can draw your own conclusions here about what Guantanamo is in reality.
The same New York Times article (above) also mentions terrorists’ theocratic designs of establishing some caliphate in the region:

One Qaeda operative, a 56-year-old known as Abu Thuha who lives in the Hawija district near Kirkuk in Iraq, spoke to an Iraqi reporter for The New York Times on Tuesday. “We have experience now fighting the Americans, and more experience now with the Syrian revolution,” he said. “Our big hope is to form a Syrian-Iraqi Islamic state for all Muslims…"

It’s important to understand that such claims by any shadowy ‘al Qaeda’ figures must also be balance with the reality that these militants have been historically, and are still today, directed and funded at the highest levels of both US and Saudi intelligence, and others. When you see terror spokesman like Ayman al-Zawahri, the alleged leader of Al Qaeda, praise the Syrian fighters by referring to them as “the lions of the Levant,” in messages released exclusively via a known CIA media dissemination outlets like SITE, or INTEL CENTER, then readers should be suspicious of why it’s been released and what political effect it is designed to have.
Now that some of the scope of NATO Allies operation in Syria has been exposed to the public, perhaps political representatives, media journalist, and editors will be able to report more accurately on the Syrian crisis, and demand a withdrawl of NATO, Arab League and others country’s support for the growing and highly dangerous paramilitary and other al Qaeda-linked terrorist groups who are currently working to take power by destabilising the country of Syria.

It’s all happening out in the open now.

World's Nuclear Waste Problem, Mafia Solves It.

This is communitarianism. This is your community at work under the EU!

The Mafia tenders for government contracts, and gets them.  Not just in Italy either!

3rd sector?   Government contracts?  To the cheapest tender?

Good luck without the Freedom of Info Act 2000 right to find out what 'they' are up to! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste_dumping_by_the_%27Ndrangheta

With no right to find out anything under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.  And new nuclear power stations planned for the UK?   

Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me! http://censys.org/blog/?p=1111

The Real Pirates of Somalia, 

Daily Kos: Pirates of Somalia: Curse of the Mafia Nuclear Waste Dumps and Thanks for All the Fish

Chris Everard on France and nuclear research, amongst other topics. 

He knows his stuff. Listen and learn,   AT 1 HOUR 12 MINUTES INTO INTERVIEW.
UNBELIEVABLE COMMUNITARIAN CORRUPTION!                                                             The stealing of Billions of tax payers’ money. 

Plus massive insurance fraud, watch and think,  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heC5Qf0WXy0

Labour is the political wing of ‘Hacked Off’

The night that proved Labour is the political wing of ‘Hacked Off’

By Andrew Pierce    PUBLISHED: 23:38, 19 March 2013 |

For almost three hours, senior figures from the Labour Party, the Lib Dems, and the pressure group Hacked Off wrangled over the detail of the proposed agreement paving the way for the first political regulation of the newspaper industry since 1695.

Bizarrely, Sunday’s crucial meeting, which started at 9pm, was not held in a Government minister’s office but in Labour leader Ed Miliband’s spacious Commons suite with its panoramic views of the River Thames.

And an analysis of the event provides an extraordinary insight into how Labour has become the political wing of a lobby group that includes Press-hating zealots, small-town academics, faded actors with rackety sex lives, and, oh yes, the S&M specialist Max Mosley.

Bizarrely, Sunday's crucial meeting, which started at 9pm, was not held in a Government minister's office but in Labour leader Ed Miliband's spacious Commons suite with its panoramic views of the River Thames

The gathering included Harriet Harman, the deputy Labour leader; Rosie Winterton, Opposition Chief Whip; former Labour Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer; and Nick Clegg.

To the fury of most Tory MPs, there were four representatives from Hacked Off, which is fronted by the actor Hugh Grant, including human rights lawyer Hugh Tomlinson QC; journalism professor Brian Cathcart; former Lib Dem MP Evan Harris, who recently took ecstasy on TV; and academic Martin Moore.

Significantly, there was no one from the newspaper industry, which was not even accorded the courtesy of being told about the meeting in advance.

Astonishingly, there were no Conservative Cabinet ministers either sitting around the long rectangle table in Miliband’s office under a portrait of Keir Hardie, founder of the modern Labour Party.

In fairness to Miliband and Harman, they had tried to secure the presence of Oliver Letwin, the Cabinet Office minister who has been engaged in talks on Press regulation for four months since the publication of Lord Leveson’s report.

Letwin, who is supposed to be the government authority on the fiendishly complex proposed system of regulation, was at his home in South London, apparently oblivious to the significance of the meeting. The six Cabinet Office civil servants who were present were unwilling or afraid to interrupt their political master’s Sunday evening.

Letwin had no idea Miliband had insisted, and Clegg had agreed, that Hacked Off had to be at the meeting to give its approval to any final blueprint for the regulatory machine for the newspaper industry.

As for the Prime Minister, he was in Downing Street, equally unaware of what was going on. His officials insist he had not gone to bed.

The gathering included Harriet Harman (left), the deputy Labour leader; Rosie Winterton, Opposition Chief Whip; former Labour Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer; and Nick Clegg

Tories outnumbered: There were also four representatives from Hacked Off, which is fronted by Hugh Grant (pictured), including human rights lawyer Hugh Tomlinson QC and journalism professor Brian Cathcart

Oliver Letwin, who is supposed to be the government authority on the fiendishly complex proposed system of regulation, was at his home in South London, apparently oblivious to the significance of the meeting

Yet it was obvious to everyone in Miliband’s office, including Letwin’s civil servants, that it was no routine gathering. Cameron, after months of insisting there would be no statute to underpin the new regulator, had clearly performed another U-turn.

Faced with certain Commons defeat in a vote on Press regulation scheduled for Monday, he had summoned Clegg to Downing Street on Sunday morning to tell him of his change of heart. Clegg, a long-standing supporter of statutory regulation, was delighted.

Later, standing on a playing field touchline watching one of his sons play football, he telephoned the Labour leader to say they were on the verge of a major breakthrough.

Harriet Harman then went to Miliband’s North London home and left after two hours, confident a deal was in their grasp. They agreed to meet at the Labour  leader’s office at 9pm.

As the meeting progressed, Harman — one of the most tribal Labour politicians — decided to contact the Tory MPs who had backed her campaign for a legislative solution.

Curiously, no efforts were made to contact Maria Miller, the hapless Conservative Culture Secretary

She texted George Eustice, a former Press secretary to Cameron who  was once a Ukip parliamentary candidate — and is known by the lobby as  Useless Eustice — to urge him to contact Oliver Letwin.

In the last text to Eustice at 10.40pm, Harman even appealed for the number of Letwin’s wife to see if she could help. Harman also tried to raise Letwin through another Tory MP and regular visitor to her Commons office — the millionaire Tory MP Zac Goldsmith.

Goldsmith had obtained a so-called super injunction in December 2008 preventing the publication of private emails which had been leaked to the Press.

Speaking at a Commons investigation into privacy, where he sat next to Hugh Grant, he had drawn a tasteless comparison between certain tabloids and the Nazi death camp at Auschwitz.

(Goldsmith had argued that newspapers should not be given free rein to print stories about the private lives of famous people simply so they could sell more copies and remain financially viable. ‘No one said Auschwitz should have been kept open because it created jobs,’ he said.)

Harman texted him several times, despite the fact he had got married for the second time only two days earlier. ‘For heavens sake, I’m texting Zac Goldsmith on his honeymoon,’ she told others at the meeting. But Goldsmith, who is in a hot spot abroad, did not pick up her texts until Monday morning.

Miliband himself threatened to phone Letwin but, in the end, it took a call from Clegg, pulling his weight as Deputy PM, to prise Letwin from his home.

Curiously, no efforts were made to contact Maria Miller, the hapless Conservative Culture Secretary, whose brief covers media regulation and who is shadowed in the Commons by Harman.

‘No one even mentioned Maria Miller,’ said another source at the meeting. ‘She’s not in the loop.’

When Letwin (known to Tory MPs as Left-wing) finally deigned to arrive at 11.45pm, the people in the room were taken aback not just by his eccentric dress sense — he was wearing mustard-coloured corduroy trousers and a sky blue shirt — but also by the fact he brought with him takeaway pepperoni pizzas.

Outrage: Tory MPs are astonished that Cameron allowed the talks to carry on in the Labour leader's office with Hacked Off present, yet with no senior player from the newspaper industry

‘As Letwin was so late, it would have improved the mood if he had shared them, as we had survived on coffee and chocolate biscuits,’ said one source. Letwin, utterly nonplussed to see Hacked Off at the negotiating table, immediately retreated with the civil servants — and his pizzas — into the waiting room of Miliband’s office to telephone the Prime Minister and inform him of their presence.

Tory MPs are astonished that Cameron allowed the talks to carry on in the Labour leader’s office with Hacked Off present, yet with no senior player from the newspaper industry.

With a triumphant Miliband in the chair, and Letwin sitting sheepishly by his side after coming back into the main office, the meeting continued as Labour and Hacked Off called the shots. At one point, Miliband announced: ‘I have a piece of good news. Hugh Grant has left the country. He is on a plane to Los Angeles.’

Everyone cheered because the zealotry of Grant had been seen by all sides as a serious obstacle to progress. 

In fact, in a heated meeting in the Commons last week, he was rebuked by Ayesha Hazarika, Harman’s special adviser, over his militant views on tethering the Press.

Heavily outnumbered, Letwin was persuaded to roll over after Miliband joined him in the waiting room — where Letwin had once again retreated — for a confidential chat.

The Labour side knew it was in the bag when Miliband came back into his office clutching a slice of Letwin’s cold pizza.

The meeting ended at 2.30am. At 4am a message was sent by Harman’s office to the BBC saying: ‘Labour is confident of the basis of a deal for Press regulation after late-night talks’.

By 6am, Harman was out of her house and touring TV and radio studios to announce that Labour had won, the PM had crossed the Rubicon and thereby avoided an embarrassing Commons defeat, and the Commons vote was cancelled.

It wasn’t until nearer 8.30am that the Tories finally got their act together and sent Maria Miller out to bat on the airwaves. Just like the night before, it seems the Tories had been asleep on the job.

In the event, in a sad comment on a day in which Her Majesty’s Opposition had shown themselves to be in the thrall of a lobby group, the newspaper industry — representing countless millions of readers — was not told about what was in the charter until late afternoon the following day.

 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2296047/The-night-proved-Labour-political-wing-Hacked-Off.html#ixzz2O6WM0Miw

Promoting Unnecessary Deaths Of Children Nationwide

The Unnecessary Deaths Of Children Nationwide

SHOCKING!  Full interview on this sick attack on young people. Tax payer funded NLP, a psychological agenda to deliberately make youngsters mentally ill.  Brian Gerrish speaks to Tim Rogers about the psychological attack on our children, and the effect it is having on their minds, up to and including suicide.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a1FEA41kSaI

Article | March 8, 2013 - 10:23am